<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1975 (11) TMI 177 - High Court Of Andhra Pradesh</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192958</link>
    <description>A beneficiary of land acquisition under the Land Acquisition Act has no locus standi to maintain an appeal against enhancement of compensation, even with leave, because the Act confines participation in reference proceedings to the Government and the landowner and does not treat the beneficiary as a person interested. The Act&#039;s special scheme overrides the general appellate procedure under the Civil Procedure Code, so leave cannot create a right of appeal where the statute excludes one. A late request to transpose the acquiring officer as appellant also failed, as the delay was inordinate and could not cure the original non-maintainability of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2017 17:42:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=479693" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1975 (11) TMI 177 - High Court Of Andhra Pradesh</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192958</link>
      <description>A beneficiary of land acquisition under the Land Acquisition Act has no locus standi to maintain an appeal against enhancement of compensation, even with leave, because the Act confines participation in reference proceedings to the Government and the landowner and does not treat the beneficiary as a person interested. The Act&#039;s special scheme overrides the general appellate procedure under the Civil Procedure Code, so leave cannot create a right of appeal where the statute excludes one. A late request to transpose the acquiring officer as appellant also failed, as the delay was inordinate and could not cure the original non-maintainability of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192958</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>