<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1973 (5) TMI 6 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8922</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the deduction of Rs. 19,11,620 for the employees&#039; gratuity liability from the valuation of equity shares. The court held that the liability was definite, ascertained, and present, not contingent, despite the option to pay in instalments. The court awarded costs to the respondents and clarified the nature of the liability as a definite and present obligation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 14:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=47962" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1973 (5) TMI 6 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8922</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the deduction of Rs. 19,11,620 for the employees&#039; gratuity liability from the valuation of equity shares. The court held that the liability was definite, ascertained, and present, not contingent, despite the option to pay in instalments. The court awarded costs to the respondents and clarified the nature of the liability as a definite and present obligation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8922</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>