<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1972 (8) TMI 34 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8918</link>
    <description>Notification imposing gratuity liability crystallises employer liability from its operative date; past service must be included to compute the quantum of that liability, but such inclusion does not render any gratuity payable in earlier years. The liability is deductible in the computation of gross profit itself rather than under a provision permitting deduction for contributions to a gratuity trust. Contingencies such as dismissal for serious misconduct do not convert the entire liability into a contingent obligation because actuarial valuation must account for such contingencies when determining the discounted present value of the liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2026 17:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=47958" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1972 (8) TMI 34 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8918</link>
      <description>Notification imposing gratuity liability crystallises employer liability from its operative date; past service must be included to compute the quantum of that liability, but such inclusion does not render any gratuity payable in earlier years. The liability is deductible in the computation of gross profit itself rather than under a provision permitting deduction for contributions to a gratuity trust. Contingencies such as dismissal for serious misconduct do not convert the entire liability into a contingent obligation because actuarial valuation must account for such contingencies when determining the discounted present value of the liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8918</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>