<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1972 (12) TMI 18 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8917</link>
    <description>Where an unregistered firm was not assessed in its own hands, a partner&#039;s share of its business loss was required to enter the partner&#039;s individual computation of business income under section 10 of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922. The Delhi HC held that the same principle applicable to a partner&#039;s share of profits also applied to losses, so the loss could be set off against the profits of the partner&#039;s personal business. It further held that the second proviso to section 24(1) barred set-off only where the unregistered firm itself claimed the adjustment, and did not prevent the partner from claiming it in his individual assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=47957" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1972 (12) TMI 18 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8917</link>
      <description>Where an unregistered firm was not assessed in its own hands, a partner&#039;s share of its business loss was required to enter the partner&#039;s individual computation of business income under section 10 of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922. The Delhi HC held that the same principle applicable to a partner&#039;s share of profits also applied to losses, so the loss could be set off against the profits of the partner&#039;s personal business. It further held that the second proviso to section 24(1) barred set-off only where the unregistered firm itself claimed the adjustment, and did not prevent the partner from claiming it in his individual assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8917</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>