https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345031 The court allowed the petitioner's revision petition under Section 264, setting aside the CIT's order and directing the AO to compute the tax liability for AY 1998-99 by allowing the claim for wage arrears. The court dismissed the Revenue's objection on the maintainability of the writ petition under Article 226, emphasizing the petitioner's entitlement to relief through the CIT's revisional jurisdiction. The writ petition was disposed of with no costs awarded. en-us Mon, 03 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 05 Jul 2017 10:53:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345031 The court allowed the petitioner's revision petition under Section 264, setting aside the CIT's order and directing the AO to compute the tax liability for AY 1998-99 by allowing the claim for wage arrears. The court dismissed the Revenue's objection on the maintainability of the writ petition under Article 226, emphasizing the petitioner's entitlement to relief through the CIT's revisional jurisdiction. The writ petition was disposed of with no costs awarded. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 03 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345031