<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 139 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345027</link>
    <description>The High Court of Bombay upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow the deduction under Section 35D for the Respondent company. The court emphasized the principle of consistency and the previous acceptance of the deduction by the Revenue for the same amount in the earlier assessment year, leading to the dismissal of the appeal without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2017 10:52:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=479435" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 139 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345027</link>
      <description>The High Court of Bombay upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow the deduction under Section 35D for the Respondent company. The court emphasized the principle of consistency and the previous acceptance of the deduction by the Revenue for the same amount in the earlier assessment year, leading to the dismissal of the appeal without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345027</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>