<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 134 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345022</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed certain appeals for remand, dismissed Revenue&#039;s appeals falling below the specified threshold, and disposed of Cross Objections accordingly. The judgment emphasized the importance of proper procedures and documentation in processing refund claims and highlighted the need for a clear nexus between input and output services for refund eligibility.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2017 14:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=479429" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 134 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345022</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed certain appeals for remand, dismissed Revenue&#039;s appeals falling below the specified threshold, and disposed of Cross Objections accordingly. The judgment emphasized the importance of proper procedures and documentation in processing refund claims and highlighted the need for a clear nexus between input and output services for refund eligibility.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345022</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>