<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 125 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345013</link>
    <description>The appeal was partially allowed by the Judicial Member, modifying the impugned order to reduce the redemption fine, grant the benefit of reduced penalty under Section 11AC, and order the refund of excess payment made by the appellant. This decision aimed to rectify discrepancies in penalties imposed, providing relief to the appellant based on legal provisions and payment records.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2017 11:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=479417" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 125 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345013</link>
      <description>The appeal was partially allowed by the Judicial Member, modifying the impugned order to reduce the redemption fine, grant the benefit of reduced penalty under Section 11AC, and order the refund of excess payment made by the appellant. This decision aimed to rectify discrepancies in penalties imposed, providing relief to the appellant based on legal provisions and payment records.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345013</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>