https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345006 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, directing the interest on duty leviable on warehoused goods to be charged until the date of receipt of sale proceeds. It emphasized that warehousing charges should not be limited by the adjudicating authority and should be paid to the warehouse-keeper from the sale proceeds. The Tribunal also clarified that rectification of computed duty liability under the DEEC scheme should be pursued separately, not within the appeal related to sale proceeds distribution. The original authority was instructed to recompute interest and warehousing charges within three months. en-us Mon, 12 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 10 Feb 2018 12:16:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345006 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, directing the interest on duty leviable on warehoused goods to be charged until the date of receipt of sale proceeds. It emphasized that warehousing charges should not be limited by the adjudicating authority and should be paid to the warehouse-keeper from the sale proceeds. The Tribunal also clarified that rectification of computed duty liability under the DEEC scheme should be pursued separately, not within the appeal related to sale proceeds distribution. The original authority was instructed to recompute interest and warehousing charges within three months. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 12 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345006