<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 115 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345003</link>
    <description>The Tribunal confirmed the dismissal of Alpha Exports&#039; appeal for not complying with the pre-deposit order, upholding the Revenue&#039;s claim against them. Additionally, in a case involving fraudulently claiming DEPB benefits, the Tribunal consolidated appeals against four respondents for misdeclaration of goods. Three respondents faced potential penalties under Section 114 of the Customs Act, with the Tribunal emphasizing the necessity of imposing penalties to deter fraudulent activities. The appeal was remanded for the adjudicating authority to consider penalties against the three respondents, stressing the importance of strict penalties to prevent future Customs fraud.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Jul 2017 15:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=479403" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 115 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345003</link>
      <description>The Tribunal confirmed the dismissal of Alpha Exports&#039; appeal for not complying with the pre-deposit order, upholding the Revenue&#039;s claim against them. Additionally, in a case involving fraudulently claiming DEPB benefits, the Tribunal consolidated appeals against four respondents for misdeclaration of goods. Three respondents faced potential penalties under Section 114 of the Customs Act, with the Tribunal emphasizing the necessity of imposing penalties to deter fraudulent activities. The appeal was remanded for the adjudicating authority to consider penalties against the three respondents, stressing the importance of strict penalties to prevent future Customs fraud.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345003</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>