<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 1686 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192940</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the partial deletion of additions related to undisclosed business income based on unrecorded purchases and entirely deleting the addition based on inflated stock statements submitted to the bank. The judgment emphasized the necessity of corroborative evidence and the non-conclusive nature of stock statements provided to banks for credit facilities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2017 10:45:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=479384" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 1686 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192940</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the partial deletion of additions related to undisclosed business income based on unrecorded purchases and entirely deleting the addition based on inflated stock statements submitted to the bank. The judgment emphasized the necessity of corroborative evidence and the non-conclusive nature of stock statements provided to banks for credit facilities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192940</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>