<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 1315 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192941</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, deleting the addition of cash deposits and partially allowing the appeal. The judgment highlighted the significance of proving known sources of income and providing substantial evidence to support transactions in income tax assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2017 10:45:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=479383" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 1315 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192941</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, deleting the addition of cash deposits and partially allowing the appeal. The judgment highlighted the significance of proving known sources of income and providing substantial evidence to support transactions in income tax assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192941</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>