<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1406 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192954</link>
    <description>The Court set aside the impugned orders for five Assessment Years, granting the respondent the chance to redo assessments. The respondent was directed to provide necessary information to the petitioner before reassessment. The petitioner could then file fresh objections. The Writ Petitions were disposed of without costs, ensuring a fair opportunity for the petitioner to respond to the allegations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2018 15:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=479370" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1406 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192954</link>
      <description>The Court set aside the impugned orders for five Assessment Years, granting the respondent the chance to redo assessments. The respondent was directed to provide necessary information to the petitioner before reassessment. The petitioner could then file fresh objections. The Writ Petitions were disposed of without costs, ensuring a fair opportunity for the petitioner to respond to the allegations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192954</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>