<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (8) TMI 356 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192936</link>
    <description>In land acquisition proceedings, the right to compensation arises when possession is taken, and later judicial enhancement only quantifies that existing right. The enhanced rate of interest under the amending law was held applicable to pending compensation proceedings, and the enhanced compensation awarded by the High Court also related back to the date of possession. Interest therefore ran on the enhanced amount from the date possession was taken until payment, rather than from the date of the appellate judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2017 10:21:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=479359" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (8) TMI 356 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192936</link>
      <description>In land acquisition proceedings, the right to compensation arises when possession is taken, and later judicial enhancement only quantifies that existing right. The enhanced rate of interest under the amending law was held applicable to pending compensation proceedings, and the enhanced compensation awarded by the High Court also related back to the date of possession. Interest therefore ran on the enhanced amount from the date possession was taken until payment, rather than from the date of the appellate judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192936</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>