<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 1083 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192933</link>
    <description>The appellant&#039;s appeal was dismissed as the Tribunal upheld the additions made by the AO regarding unexplained investments, income from resort business, and unsecured loans. The CIT(A) and Tribunal found the explanations provided by the appellant lacking in supporting evidence, leading to the dismissal of the appeal on all grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2017 17:44:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=479245" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 1083 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192933</link>
      <description>The appellant&#039;s appeal was dismissed as the Tribunal upheld the additions made by the AO regarding unexplained investments, income from resort business, and unsecured loans. The CIT(A) and Tribunal found the explanations provided by the appellant lacking in supporting evidence, leading to the dismissal of the appeal on all grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192933</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>