<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1972 (9) TMI 33 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8881</link>
    <description>The court held that the room rent paid by the assessee, though required by the conditions of service, did not qualify as expenditure &quot;in the performance of duties&quot; under section 16(v) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Therefore, the deduction was disallowed, ruling in favor of the revenue and against the assessee. The parties were to bear their own costs, and the judgment was to be sent to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Cochin Bench.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 19:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=47921" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1972 (9) TMI 33 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8881</link>
      <description>The court held that the room rent paid by the assessee, though required by the conditions of service, did not qualify as expenditure &quot;in the performance of duties&quot; under section 16(v) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Therefore, the deduction was disallowed, ruling in favor of the revenue and against the assessee. The parties were to bear their own costs, and the judgment was to be sent to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Cochin Bench.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8881</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>