<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1972 (10) TMI 25 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8874</link>
    <description>Tea income is to be split under the constitutional and statutory scheme by deriving the agricultural component from the income computed under income-tax law. The State Agricultural Income-tax Officer cannot adopt a different basis that would enlarge agricultural income or reopen deductions already allowed by the Central income-tax computation. Deductions permitted in the Central assessment bind the State computation for the tea portion, so items 2 and 3 could not be disallowed again. Head office expenditure under item 1 was also allowable, because if the cardamom allocation was not sustainable, the amount had to be treated as relatable to tea cultivation and allowed against tea income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 19:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=47914" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1972 (10) TMI 25 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8874</link>
      <description>Tea income is to be split under the constitutional and statutory scheme by deriving the agricultural component from the income computed under income-tax law. The State Agricultural Income-tax Officer cannot adopt a different basis that would enlarge agricultural income or reopen deductions already allowed by the Central income-tax computation. Deductions permitted in the Central assessment bind the State computation for the tea portion, so items 2 and 3 could not be disallowed again. Head office expenditure under item 1 was also allowable, because if the cardamom allocation was not sustainable, the amount had to be treated as relatable to tea cultivation and allowed against tea income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8874</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>