<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1972 (12) TMI 13 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8873</link>
    <description>Commission deductions require credible proof of payment and services rendered. Where the alleged recipients deny receiving commission and other material indicates another person procured the orders, the claimed commission may be disallowed. Suppressed business income may be estimated where customer inquiries reveal undelivered correspondence, denials of purchases, extra payments and price disparities supporting doubts about recorded sales. Once the assessing officer reasonably doubts the return&#039;s accuracy, the taxpayer must substantiate its claims. The assessing officer is not bound by strict evidentiary rules but must comply with natural justice; that requirement is met where an opportunity to cross-examine witnesses is offered and not used.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 19:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=47913" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1972 (12) TMI 13 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8873</link>
      <description>Commission deductions require credible proof of payment and services rendered. Where the alleged recipients deny receiving commission and other material indicates another person procured the orders, the claimed commission may be disallowed. Suppressed business income may be estimated where customer inquiries reveal undelivered correspondence, denials of purchases, extra payments and price disparities supporting doubts about recorded sales. Once the assessing officer reasonably doubts the return&#039;s accuracy, the taxpayer must substantiate its claims. The assessing officer is not bound by strict evidentiary rules but must comply with natural justice; that requirement is met where an opportunity to cross-examine witnesses is offered and not used.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8873</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>