<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Extended Limitation Period Needs Evidence of Fraud or Collusion, Not Just Non-Disclosure Without Legal Obligation.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=35398</link>
    <description>Extended period of limitation - the expression &quot;suppression of facts&quot;, has to take colour from the words whose company, it appears in. A mere non-disclosure of information, when there is no obligation in law to furnish the same, will not amount to, in our opinion, fraud or collusion or even, wilful misstatement and, hence, trigger the extended period of limitation. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2017 09:17:53 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2017 09:17:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=479019" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Extended Limitation Period Needs Evidence of Fraud or Collusion, Not Just Non-Disclosure Without Legal Obligation.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=35398</link>
      <description>Extended period of limitation - the expression &quot;suppression of facts&quot;, has to take colour from the words whose company, it appears in. A mere non-disclosure of information, when there is no obligation in law to furnish the same, will not amount to, in our opinion, fraud or collusion or even, wilful misstatement and, hence, trigger the extended period of limitation. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2017 09:17:53 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=35398</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>