<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 107 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344995</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the appellant, excluding the period from 24.05.2001 to 03.01.2002 for interest computation. The Assessing Officer was directed to recompute the interest accordingly. The appeal was allowed, and the interest for the delay attributable to the revenue was to be excluded. The Assessing Officer was instructed to adjust the interest demand based on the revised computation. No order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2017 14:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=479013" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 107 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344995</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the appellant, excluding the period from 24.05.2001 to 03.01.2002 for interest computation. The Assessing Officer was directed to recompute the interest accordingly. The appeal was allowed, and the interest for the delay attributable to the revenue was to be excluded. The Assessing Officer was instructed to adjust the interest demand based on the revised computation. No order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344995</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>