<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 101 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344989</link>
    <description>Where sales are accepted but purchases are not fully verifiable because suppliers are not produced and notices return unserved, the entire purchase value should not be disallowed. Only the profit element embedded in the impugned purchases can be estimated and brought to tax on a reasonable basis, having regard to the nature of business, accepted sales, and surrounding facts. Applying that approach, the estimated disallowance on alleged bogus purchases was reduced from 12.5% to 8%, and relief was granted to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2017 07:22:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=479007" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 101 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344989</link>
      <description>Where sales are accepted but purchases are not fully verifiable because suppliers are not produced and notices return unserved, the entire purchase value should not be disallowed. Only the profit element embedded in the impugned purchases can be estimated and brought to tax on a reasonable basis, having regard to the nature of business, accepted sales, and surrounding facts. Applying that approach, the estimated disallowance on alleged bogus purchases was reduced from 12.5% to 8%, and relief was granted to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344989</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>