<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 91 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344979</link>
    <description>CENVAT credit on capital goods sent to a sister unit for job work was reversible because the record did not show receipt back within 180 days, and re-credit was available only upon subsequent receipt; the demand for reversal was upheld. Penalty under Rule 15(2) read with Section 11AC was not sustained in view of the High Court ruling relied on by the assessee, so the penalty was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Aug 2017 14:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=478997" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 91 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344979</link>
      <description>CENVAT credit on capital goods sent to a sister unit for job work was reversible because the record did not show receipt back within 180 days, and re-credit was available only upon subsequent receipt; the demand for reversal was upheld. Penalty under Rule 15(2) read with Section 11AC was not sustained in view of the High Court ruling relied on by the assessee, so the penalty was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344979</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>