<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 90 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344978</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal regarding the denial of CENVAT credit on the attested copy of the bill of entry, stating that the credit availed on duty paid as per the attested copy was admissible. The Tribunal also ruled in favor of the appellant in challenging the denial of credit on dealer&#039;s invoices, emphasizing that raising new grounds based on additional evidence not mentioned in the show cause notice was unsustainable in law. Additionally, the Tribunal directed the Revenue to provide the appellant with a copy of a report disputing the receipt of goods before deciding on the admissibility of the credit. The Revenue&#039;s request for remand was granted for a fresh decision on the admissibility of a specific credit amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Aug 2017 10:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=478996" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 90 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344978</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal regarding the denial of CENVAT credit on the attested copy of the bill of entry, stating that the credit availed on duty paid as per the attested copy was admissible. The Tribunal also ruled in favor of the appellant in challenging the denial of credit on dealer&#039;s invoices, emphasizing that raising new grounds based on additional evidence not mentioned in the show cause notice was unsustainable in law. Additionally, the Tribunal directed the Revenue to provide the appellant with a copy of a report disputing the receipt of goods before deciding on the admissibility of the credit. The Revenue&#039;s request for remand was granted for a fresh decision on the admissibility of a specific credit amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344978</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>