https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344961 Preventive detention under COFEPOSA was upheld where the grounds and relied-upon documents were effectively communicated in a language understood by the detenue, with translated material served within the statutory framework. The Court also treated the detaining authority's subjective satisfaction as based on relevant material, including evidence of a sustained smuggling operation and the detenue's role in it. Reliance on a co-detenue's retracted statement was not fatal because the retraction was before the authority and the statement was corroborated by other material. The record also showed family intimation, and the omission to separately decide an earlier representation did not invalidate detention where the later representation covered the same grounds. en-us Wed, 28 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 30 Jan 2018 13:06:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344961 Preventive detention under COFEPOSA was upheld where the grounds and relied-upon documents were effectively communicated in a language understood by the detenue, with translated material served within the statutory framework. The Court also treated the detaining authority's subjective satisfaction as based on relevant material, including evidence of a sustained smuggling operation and the detenue's role in it. Reliance on a co-detenue's retracted statement was not fatal because the retraction was before the authority and the statement was corroborated by other material. The record also showed family intimation, and the omission to separately decide an earlier representation did not invalidate detention where the later representation covered the same grounds. Case-Laws FEMA Wed, 28 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344961