<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1943 (3) TMI 17 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192921</link>
    <description>An amended penalty provision applies to a default consisting of failure to comply with a lawful notice issued after the amendment came into force, because liability attaches only to the post-amendment non-compliance and not retrospectively to an earlier notice. For penalty for non-production of books, the income-tax authority must have evidence sufficient to reasonably satisfy it that the factual default occurred; penalty cannot rest on conjecture. While a best judgment assessment may be based on estimate, penalty proceedings require a firmer evidentiary foundation, though the sufficiency of proof depends on the facts of each case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 1943 00:00:00 +0630</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2017 17:53:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=478926" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1943 (3) TMI 17 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192921</link>
      <description>An amended penalty provision applies to a default consisting of failure to comply with a lawful notice issued after the amendment came into force, because liability attaches only to the post-amendment non-compliance and not retrospectively to an earlier notice. For penalty for non-production of books, the income-tax authority must have evidence sufficient to reasonably satisfy it that the factual default occurred; penalty cannot rest on conjecture. While a best judgment assessment may be based on estimate, penalty proceedings require a firmer evidentiary foundation, though the sufficiency of proof depends on the facts of each case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 1943 00:00:00 +0630</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192921</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>