<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1972 (1) TMI 33 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8819</link>
    <description>A constitutional reference to &quot;agricultural income&quot; may be read dynamically where the text and purpose indicate that the State definition should track the income-tax law in force from time to time, so the amended Kerala definition was valid. A retrospective validating tax law is effective where the legislature has competence and the later enactment removes the defect that had affected the earlier levy; section 2 supplied the basis and section 3 validated prior proceedings. Retrospectivity in taxation is not unconstitutional merely because it is burdensome; absent proof that the levy is confiscatory or a cloak for expropriation, it remains within ordinary taxing power.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 18:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=47860" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1972 (1) TMI 33 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8819</link>
      <description>A constitutional reference to &quot;agricultural income&quot; may be read dynamically where the text and purpose indicate that the State definition should track the income-tax law in force from time to time, so the amended Kerala definition was valid. A retrospective validating tax law is effective where the legislature has competence and the later enactment removes the defect that had affected the earlier levy; section 2 supplied the basis and section 3 validated prior proceedings. Retrospectivity in taxation is not unconstitutional merely because it is burdensome; absent proof that the levy is confiscatory or a cloak for expropriation, it remains within ordinary taxing power.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8819</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>