<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 64 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344952</link>
    <description>Renting vehicles to identified users for exclusive use is taxable under the rent-a-cab service entry where contractual arrangements transfer possession and control to the users for consideration. The distinction between hiring and renting depends on the hirer&#039;s possession and control, with the Motor Vehicles Act scheme supporting this classification. Collection of tax without deposit defeats a bona fide confusion plea for limitation, so the limitation objection fails. However, admissible abatement, the precise levy, and penalty require fresh adjudication, including consideration of statutory discretion where field-level confusion existed. Core service-tax liability remains sustained, subject to limited re-adjudication of abatement, quantum, and penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2017 14:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=478529" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 64 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344952</link>
      <description>Renting vehicles to identified users for exclusive use is taxable under the rent-a-cab service entry where contractual arrangements transfer possession and control to the users for consideration. The distinction between hiring and renting depends on the hirer&#039;s possession and control, with the Motor Vehicles Act scheme supporting this classification. Collection of tax without deposit defeats a bona fide confusion plea for limitation, so the limitation objection fails. However, admissible abatement, the precise levy, and penalty require fresh adjudication, including consideration of statutory discretion where field-level confusion existed. Core service-tax liability remains sustained, subject to limited re-adjudication of abatement, quantum, and penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344952</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>