https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344944 The appeal was made against the rejection of CENVAT credit on inputs used in job work goods under Rule 3(i) and Rule 6(i) of the CENVAT Credit Rules (CCR), 2004. The Judicial Member allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order, based on the decision in Sterlite Industries Ltd. case by the Larger Bench. The judgment emphasized the importance of legal provisions and precedents in determining CENVAT credit eligibility, leading to a favorable outcome for the appellant. en-us Thu, 08 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 Jul 2017 10:51:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344944 The appeal was made against the rejection of CENVAT credit on inputs used in job work goods under Rule 3(i) and Rule 6(i) of the CENVAT Credit Rules (CCR), 2004. The Judicial Member allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order, based on the decision in Sterlite Industries Ltd. case by the Larger Bench. The judgment emphasized the importance of legal provisions and precedents in determining CENVAT credit eligibility, leading to a favorable outcome for the appellant. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 08 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344944