<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 51 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344939</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal on the grounds of limitation, setting aside the Commissioner (Appeals) order, and remanded the matter for a fresh decision on the classification of the product. The Tribunal directed the Original Authority to reexamine the classification issue, giving the appellant an opportunity to present their case and evidence. The Original Authority was instructed to issue a reasoned decision within three months.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2017 10:05:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=478516" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 51 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344939</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal on the grounds of limitation, setting aside the Commissioner (Appeals) order, and remanded the matter for a fresh decision on the classification of the product. The Tribunal directed the Original Authority to reexamine the classification issue, giving the appellant an opportunity to present their case and evidence. The Original Authority was instructed to issue a reasoned decision within three months.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344939</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>