<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 39 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344927</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order for the assessment year 2008-09. The case involved undisclosed business income from unrecorded purchases and stock valuation discrepancies in a wholesale grocery business. The Tribunal found the Revenue&#039;s additions unjustified, accepting only 5% of certain purchases as undisclosed income due to lack of evidence. Additionally, the court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision on stock valuation, emphasizing the importance of factual evidence in tax assessments. The appeal was rejected as no substantial legal question was identified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2017 11:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=478423" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 39 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344927</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order for the assessment year 2008-09. The case involved undisclosed business income from unrecorded purchases and stock valuation discrepancies in a wholesale grocery business. The Tribunal found the Revenue&#039;s additions unjustified, accepting only 5% of certain purchases as undisclosed income due to lack of evidence. Additionally, the court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision on stock valuation, emphasizing the importance of factual evidence in tax assessments. The appeal was rejected as no substantial legal question was identified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344927</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>