<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 4 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344892</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the show cause notice issued by the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, citing a Delhi High Court judgment that found DRI lacked jurisdiction to issue such notices. The Tribunal referred to a Supreme Court decision and Customs Act amendments designating DRI officers as &#039;proper officers.&#039; Due to conflicting High Court decisions, the matter was elevated to the Supreme Court. Following the Delhi High Court&#039;s precedent, the Tribunal remanded the case for the adjudicating authority to determine jurisdiction post the Supreme Court&#039;s decision, ensuring the assessee&#039;s right to be heard. The appeals were allowed by remand, maintaining the status quo until a final decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Jul 2017 18:33:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=478377" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 4 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344892</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the show cause notice issued by the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, citing a Delhi High Court judgment that found DRI lacked jurisdiction to issue such notices. The Tribunal referred to a Supreme Court decision and Customs Act amendments designating DRI officers as &#039;proper officers.&#039; Due to conflicting High Court decisions, the matter was elevated to the Supreme Court. Following the Delhi High Court&#039;s precedent, the Tribunal remanded the case for the adjudicating authority to determine jurisdiction post the Supreme Court&#039;s decision, ensuring the assessee&#039;s right to be heard. The appeals were allowed by remand, maintaining the status quo until a final decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344892</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>