<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 2 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344890</link>
    <description>The Court set aside the order revoking the license under Section 25(8)(b) of the Companies Act, 1956, due to non-compliance with natural justice principles. Emphasizing the necessity of providing an opportunity to be heard before taking actions with civil consequences, the judgment highlighted the importance of procedural fairness. The decision focused solely on the violation of natural justice, leading to the ruling in favor of the petitioner and making the rule absolute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2017 17:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=478373" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 2 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344890</link>
      <description>The Court set aside the order revoking the license under Section 25(8)(b) of the Companies Act, 1956, due to non-compliance with natural justice principles. Emphasizing the necessity of providing an opportunity to be heard before taking actions with civil consequences, the judgment highlighted the importance of procedural fairness. The decision focused solely on the violation of natural justice, leading to the ruling in favor of the petitioner and making the rule absolute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344890</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>