<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 1 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344889</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s decision to reject applications under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The Tribunal found that the disputes raised by the Corporate Debtors regarding the quality of services were genuine and not raised to stall the insolvency process. The broader interpretation of the term &quot;dispute&quot; under the Code was affirmed, and the appeals were dismissed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2019 15:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=478372" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 1 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344889</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s decision to reject applications under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The Tribunal found that the disputes raised by the Corporate Debtors regarding the quality of services were genuine and not raised to stall the insolvency process. The broader interpretation of the term &quot;dispute&quot; under the Code was affirmed, and the appeals were dismissed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344889</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>