<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 1324 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192908</link>
    <description>The tribunal set aside the lower authorities&#039; orders and deleted the addition of Rs. 3,46,000 in the hands of the assessee firm, allowing the appeal. The decision emphasized the importance of establishing the source of funds in partnership firms and the impact of individual partner assessments on firm-level additions. Proper record-keeping and compliance with tax laws were highlighted to avoid unwarranted additions to a firm&#039;s income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Jul 2017 18:32:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=478364" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 1324 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192908</link>
      <description>The tribunal set aside the lower authorities&#039; orders and deleted the addition of Rs. 3,46,000 in the hands of the assessee firm, allowing the appeal. The decision emphasized the importance of establishing the source of funds in partnership firms and the impact of individual partner assessments on firm-level additions. Proper record-keeping and compliance with tax laws were highlighted to avoid unwarranted additions to a firm&#039;s income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192908</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>