<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1972 (6) TMI 20 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8791</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the assessee, not being a coparcener, could not convert her separate property into joint family property by mere declaration. The Court emphasized that only coparceners have the right to throw separate property into the joint family hotchpot. The assessee was directed to pay costs to the Commissioner of Income-tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 17:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=47833" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1972 (6) TMI 20 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8791</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the assessee, not being a coparcener, could not convert her separate property into joint family property by mere declaration. The Court emphasized that only coparceners have the right to throw separate property into the joint family hotchpot. The assessee was directed to pay costs to the Commissioner of Income-tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8791</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>