<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1971 (7) TMI 48 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8779</link>
    <description>The court upheld the constitutionality of Section 139(1), proviso (iii)(a) and (b), of the Income-tax Act, 1961, finding it not in violation of Article 14 of the Constitution. However, defaulting registered firms were deemed entitled to credit for advance tax paid, akin to other assessees. The court partially allowed the writ petitions, directing assessments to be revised accordingly, with no costs ordered.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 18:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=47821" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1971 (7) TMI 48 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8779</link>
      <description>The court upheld the constitutionality of Section 139(1), proviso (iii)(a) and (b), of the Income-tax Act, 1961, finding it not in violation of Article 14 of the Constitution. However, defaulting registered firms were deemed entitled to credit for advance tax paid, akin to other assessees. The court partially allowed the writ petitions, directing assessments to be revised accordingly, with no costs ordered.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8779</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>