<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1972 (7) TMI 16 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8778</link>
    <description>Unauthorised use of company cars does not constitute a taxable benefit or perquisite under the relevant income-tax provisions unless it arises through an arrangement with the company or an enforceable right to claim the benefit. Use without the company&#039;s authority or knowledge falls outside that concept. Where car expenses were disallowed in the company&#039;s assessment because of use by managing agents, rather than by individuals as directors, the alleged benefit must be assessed in the proper taxable entity. Partners&#039; individual assessments cannot be directly reopened on that basis where the managing agency firm was not assessed for the alleged benefit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 18:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=47820" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1972 (7) TMI 16 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8778</link>
      <description>Unauthorised use of company cars does not constitute a taxable benefit or perquisite under the relevant income-tax provisions unless it arises through an arrangement with the company or an enforceable right to claim the benefit. Use without the company&#039;s authority or knowledge falls outside that concept. Where car expenses were disallowed in the company&#039;s assessment because of use by managing agents, rather than by individuals as directors, the alleged benefit must be assessed in the proper taxable entity. Partners&#039; individual assessments cannot be directly reopened on that basis where the managing agency firm was not assessed for the alleged benefit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8778</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>