<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1972 (2) TMI 21 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8775</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the reassessment proceedings under section 147(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 were not validly initiated. The court found that the Income-tax Officer did not have jurisdiction to reopen the assessment as all material facts were fully and truly disclosed during the original assessment. The assessee was awarded costs, and the advocate&#039;s fee was set at Rs. 250.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 18:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=47817" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1972 (2) TMI 21 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8775</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the reassessment proceedings under section 147(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 were not validly initiated. The court found that the Income-tax Officer did not have jurisdiction to reopen the assessment as all material facts were fully and truly disclosed during the original assessment. The assessee was awarded costs, and the advocate&#039;s fee was set at Rs. 250.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8775</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>