https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8770 The review judge dismissed the writ petition in a case involving time-barred recovery proceedings, based on the appellant's alleged suppression of crucial documents extending the time for payment. Technical objections raised during the review application, including the competency of a review application in a writ petition under article 226 of the Constitution, were rejected. It was established that the High Court has the power to review orders under article 226. The review judge's decision to dismiss the writ petition was upheld, considering the exclusion of time for obtaining certified copies. The appeal challenging the review judge's decision was ultimately dismissed. en-us Sat, 27 Nov 1971 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 03 Jun 2009 18:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8770 The review judge dismissed the writ petition in a case involving time-barred recovery proceedings, based on the appellant's alleged suppression of crucial documents extending the time for payment. Technical objections raised during the review application, including the competency of a review application in a writ petition under article 226 of the Constitution, were rejected. It was established that the High Court has the power to review orders under article 226. The review judge's decision to dismiss the writ petition was upheld, considering the exclusion of time for obtaining certified copies. The appeal challenging the review judge's decision was ultimately dismissed. Case-Laws Income Tax Sat, 27 Nov 1971 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8770