<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1956 (2) TMI 66 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192901</link>
    <description>The Andhra Pradesh HC held that an appeal filed in the name of a deceased assessee was nevertheless competently presented where the widow, as legal representative, acted through a duly constituted power-of-attorney agent; the defect in description did not invalidate the appeal. On the tax issue, lump sum amounts described as royalty for mining leases of 25 and 30 years were treated as revenue receipts because, in substance, they represented consolidated rent for continued enjoyment of the mining rights rather than consideration for parting with a capital asset. The tax reference was answered for the Revenue on that issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 1956 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2017 18:34:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=477631" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1956 (2) TMI 66 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192901</link>
      <description>The Andhra Pradesh HC held that an appeal filed in the name of a deceased assessee was nevertheless competently presented where the widow, as legal representative, acted through a duly constituted power-of-attorney agent; the defect in description did not invalidate the appeal. On the tax issue, lump sum amounts described as royalty for mining leases of 25 and 30 years were treated as revenue receipts because, in substance, they represented consolidated rent for continued enjoyment of the mining rights rather than consideration for parting with a capital asset. The tax reference was answered for the Revenue on that issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 1956 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192901</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>