https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8706 Section 559 of the Companies Act, 1956 was construed as limiting the court's power to declare a company's dissolution void to a two-year period from the date of dissolution, unlike section 560(6), which limits only the filing of the application. The differing wording was treated as deliberate, so the statutory time limit went to the court's jurisdiction itself, not merely procedure. Because the application was filed after two years from the dissolution order, the jurisdictional precondition was not met and the application was barred by limitation. en-us Mon, 10 Jul 1972 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 03 Jun 2009 10:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8706 Section 559 of the Companies Act, 1956 was construed as limiting the court's power to declare a company's dissolution void to a two-year period from the date of dissolution, unlike section 560(6), which limits only the filing of the application. The differing wording was treated as deliberate, so the statutory time limit went to the court's jurisdiction itself, not merely procedure. Because the application was filed after two years from the dissolution order, the jurisdictional precondition was not met and the application was barred by limitation. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 10 Jul 1972 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8706