<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1972 (1) TMI 25 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8663</link>
    <description>The court held that the partnership between the karta of a Hindu undivided family and a junior member with separate property was valid. The partnership was entitled to registration under the Income-tax Act, allowing the junior member to bring in separate property and maintain distinct ownership rights. The court distinguished cases where separate assets were not brought in or the business belonged to the family. It emphasized that individual members could enter partnerships for business purposes. The court affirmed the validity of the partnership, excluding income from the family&#039;s assessment and awarded costs and counsel fees to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 17:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=47706" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1972 (1) TMI 25 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8663</link>
      <description>The court held that the partnership between the karta of a Hindu undivided family and a junior member with separate property was valid. The partnership was entitled to registration under the Income-tax Act, allowing the junior member to bring in separate property and maintain distinct ownership rights. The court distinguished cases where separate assets were not brought in or the business belonged to the family. It emphasized that individual members could enter partnerships for business purposes. The court affirmed the validity of the partnership, excluding income from the family&#039;s assessment and awarded costs and counsel fees to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8663</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>