<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1972 (8) TMI 10 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8632</link>
    <description>Under the Estate Duty Act, 1953, an unequal partition of Hindu undivided family property can be treated as a deemed disposition where the deceased coparcener takes less than his lawful share and the resulting benefit accrues to relatives. Section 27 read with Explanation 2 to section 2(15) creates a statutory fiction under which extinguishment of the deceased&#039;s right at his expense is deemed a transfer, even though partition is not a transfer in ordinary property law. The earlier estate duty view was treated as continuing good law, and the excess value representing the shortfall in the deceased&#039;s share was chargeable as property deemed to pass on death.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 17:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=47675" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1972 (8) TMI 10 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8632</link>
      <description>Under the Estate Duty Act, 1953, an unequal partition of Hindu undivided family property can be treated as a deemed disposition where the deceased coparcener takes less than his lawful share and the resulting benefit accrues to relatives. Section 27 read with Explanation 2 to section 2(15) creates a statutory fiction under which extinguishment of the deceased&#039;s right at his expense is deemed a transfer, even though partition is not a transfer in ordinary property law. The earlier estate duty view was treated as continuing good law, and the excess value representing the shortfall in the deceased&#039;s share was chargeable as property deemed to pass on death.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8632</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>