<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1971 (5) TMI 28 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8625</link>
    <description>Interest credited to the assessee&#039;s wife and minor son in the firm was held includible in the assessee&#039;s total income under section 16(3)(a)(i) and (ii) because the funds remained with the firm in circumstances linked to their status in the partnership. The credits arose from partition of the joint family business and were carried into the new firm without any specific agreement converting them into ordinary loans or deposits. The arrangement was not treated as a normal outsider lending transaction, since the rate of interest was to be fixed by the partners and was payable irrespective of profits. The interest was therefore treated as arising at least indirectly from the wife&#039;s membership and the minor&#039;s admission to benefits of the partnership.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 May 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 17:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=47668" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1971 (5) TMI 28 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8625</link>
      <description>Interest credited to the assessee&#039;s wife and minor son in the firm was held includible in the assessee&#039;s total income under section 16(3)(a)(i) and (ii) because the funds remained with the firm in circumstances linked to their status in the partnership. The credits arose from partition of the joint family business and were carried into the new firm without any specific agreement converting them into ordinary loans or deposits. The arrangement was not treated as a normal outsider lending transaction, since the rate of interest was to be fixed by the partners and was payable irrespective of profits. The interest was therefore treated as arising at least indirectly from the wife&#039;s membership and the minor&#039;s admission to benefits of the partnership.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 May 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8625</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>