<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1972 (6) TMI 8 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8619</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, directing the Tribunal to reevaluate the registration refusal based on the genuineness of the partnership and the corrected date in the partnership document. The court emphasized the need to assess the substantive validity of legal documents beyond technical errors like date inconsistencies.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 13:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=47662" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1972 (6) TMI 8 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8619</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, directing the Tribunal to reevaluate the registration refusal based on the genuineness of the partnership and the corrected date in the partnership document. The court emphasized the need to assess the substantive validity of legal documents beyond technical errors like date inconsistencies.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8619</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>