<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 1157 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344886</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision to treat the land as a capital asset up to the date of conversion into stock-in-trade, assessing the profit on sale under &#039;Profits and gains of business.&#039; The application of Section 45(2) of the Income Tax Act directed the computation of capital gains up to the conversion date and treating the difference post-conversion as &#039;business income.&#039; The Board&#039;s resolution altering the land&#039;s character was deemed invalid, and the demerger did not affect tax liability. The appeal against the Revenue was dismissed, and the Deputy Commissioner modified the assessee&#039;s total income in line with Section 45(2).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2017 07:11:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=476445" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 1157 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344886</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision to treat the land as a capital asset up to the date of conversion into stock-in-trade, assessing the profit on sale under &#039;Profits and gains of business.&#039; The application of Section 45(2) of the Income Tax Act directed the computation of capital gains up to the conversion date and treating the difference post-conversion as &#039;business income.&#039; The Board&#039;s resolution altering the land&#039;s character was deemed invalid, and the demerger did not affect tax liability. The appeal against the Revenue was dismissed, and the Deputy Commissioner modified the assessee&#039;s total income in line with Section 45(2).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344886</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>