<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 1144 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344873</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in the case concerning the liability of service tax on reimbursable expenses. It held that service tax cannot be levied on such expenses and directed the original authority to exclude reimbursable expenses from the assessable value for C &amp;amp; F services. The Tribunal also found that the show cause notice did not justify invoking the extended period for demand. The matter was remanded for redetermination of service tax liability, emphasizing the exclusion of reimbursable expenses. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the Order-in-Appeal and limiting penalties to those sustained in the impugned order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2017 17:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=476432" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 1144 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344873</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in the case concerning the liability of service tax on reimbursable expenses. It held that service tax cannot be levied on such expenses and directed the original authority to exclude reimbursable expenses from the assessable value for C &amp;amp; F services. The Tribunal also found that the show cause notice did not justify invoking the extended period for demand. The matter was remanded for redetermination of service tax liability, emphasizing the exclusion of reimbursable expenses. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the Order-in-Appeal and limiting penalties to those sustained in the impugned order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344873</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>