<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 1142 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344871</link>
    <description>The tribunal held that mining activities undertaken by the appellant were not liable for service tax during the disputed period. The impugned order confirming the service tax demand was set aside, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant based on established legal positions regarding the taxability of mining services before June 2007.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2017 07:10:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=476430" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 1142 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344871</link>
      <description>The tribunal held that mining activities undertaken by the appellant were not liable for service tax during the disputed period. The impugned order confirming the service tax demand was set aside, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant based on established legal positions regarding the taxability of mining services before June 2007.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344871</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>