<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 1137 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344866</link>
    <description>The Member (Judicial) upheld the chargeability of interest under Rule 14 for wrongly taken Cenvat credit, while setting aside the penalty imposed due to conflicting judicial precedents on the reversal of credit for exempted goods. The appeal was partially allowed, modifying the order to waive the penalty but affirming the interest charge.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2017 07:10:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=476425" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 1137 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344866</link>
      <description>The Member (Judicial) upheld the chargeability of interest under Rule 14 for wrongly taken Cenvat credit, while setting aside the penalty imposed due to conflicting judicial precedents on the reversal of credit for exempted goods. The appeal was partially allowed, modifying the order to waive the penalty but affirming the interest charge.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344866</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>