<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 1135 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344864</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the imposed penalty of &amp;amp;8377; 75 lakhs under Rule 26 of Central Excise Rules, 2002, as it exceeded the scope of the show cause notice issued under Rule 27. The appellant successfully argued lack of opportunity to present a defense against the penalty. The judgment emphasizes the necessity of aligning penalties with the allegations in the show cause notice to uphold procedural fairness and compliance with Central Excise Rules, 2002.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2017 07:09:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=476423" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 1135 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344864</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the imposed penalty of &amp;amp;8377; 75 lakhs under Rule 26 of Central Excise Rules, 2002, as it exceeded the scope of the show cause notice issued under Rule 27. The appellant successfully argued lack of opportunity to present a defense against the penalty. The judgment emphasizes the necessity of aligning penalties with the allegations in the show cause notice to uphold procedural fairness and compliance with Central Excise Rules, 2002.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344864</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>